Is Log4j 1 affected?

Is Log4j version 1 affected

Applications using Log4j 1. x are only vulnerable to this attack when they use JNDI in their configuration. A separate CVE (CVE-2021-4104) has been filed for this vulnerability. To mitigate: Audit your logging configuration to ensure it has no JMSAppender configured.

Is Log4j 1 affected by vulnerability

JMSSink in Log4j 1. x is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data. This flaw allows a remote attacker to execute code on the server if the deployed application is configured to use JMSSink and to the attacker's JNDI LDAP endpoint.

Is Log4j 1 still supported

Log4j 1. x has reached End of Life in 2015 and is no longer supported.

Which version of Log4j is affected

Technical Details. The CVE-2021-44228 RCE vulnerability—affecting Apache's Log4j library, versions 2.0-beta9 to 2.14.

Is Log4j 1 Secure

Although this is a secure functionality, the Log4j flaw allows an attacker to input their own JNDI lookups, where they then direct the server to their fake LDAP server.

Is 1.18 1 safe from Log4j

Is My Server Safe All servers running 1.18. 1 and above are completely safe.

Is Log4j 2.12 1 vulnerable

log4j:log4j-core is a logging library for Java. Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE). Apache Log4j2 JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints.

Is Log4j version 1 end of life

It is part of the Apache Logging Services, a project of the Apache Software Foundation. Log4j 1 reached End-Of-Life on August 2015.

Does Log4j 1.2 have vulnerability

JMSAppender, in log4j 1.2 version, is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data if the attacker has the 'write' permissions to the log4j configuration.

Is Log4j 2.17 1 safe

1 can probably wait. A number of security professionals say that the latest vulnerability in Apache Log4j, disclosed on Tuesday, does not pose an increased security risk for the majority of organizations. As a result, for many organizations that have already patched to version 2.17.

Is Log4j 1.2 end of life

Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. CSM version 6.3.

Is Log4j 1.2 safe

Included in Log4j 1.2 is a SocketServer class that is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data which can be exploited to remotely execute arbitrary code when combined with a deserialization gadget when listening to untrusted network traffic for log data.

Is Log4j 1.2 17 jar affected

Included in Log4j 1.2 is a SocketServer class that is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data which can be exploited to remotely execute arbitrary code when combined with a deserialization gadget when listening to untrusted network traffic for log data. This affects Log4j versions up to 1.2 up to 1.2. 17.

Is Log4j 1.2 affected by vulnerability

JMSAppender, in log4j 1.2 version, is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data if the attacker has the 'write' permissions to the log4j configuration.

Does log4j 1.2 have vulnerability

JMSAppender, in log4j 1.2 version, is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data if the attacker has the 'write' permissions to the log4j configuration.

Does log4j 1.2 14 have vulnerability

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Deserialization of Untrusted Data. JMSSink in all versions of Log4j 1. x is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration or if the configuration references an LDAP service the attacker has access to.

Is Log4j 1.2 17 Safe

Included in Log4j 1.2 is a SocketServer class that is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data which can be exploited to remotely execute arbitrary code when combined with a deserialization gadget when listening to untrusted network traffic for log data.

Is Log4j 1.2 7 vulnerable

JMSAppender, in log4j 1.2 version, is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data if the attacker has the 'write' permissions to the log4j configuration.