Is log4j 2.6 2 vulnerable?

Which version of Log4j is vulnerable

Technical Details. The CVE-2021-44228 RCE vulnerability—affecting Apache's Log4j library, versions 2.0-beta9 to 2.14. 1—exists in the action the Java Naming and Directory Interface (JNDI) takes to resolve variables.

Is Log4j Core 2.16 0 jar vulnerable

Vulnerability Details

CVSS Temporal Score: See: https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/216189 for the current score. DESCRIPTION: Apache Log4j is vulnerable to a denial of service, caused by the failure to protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups.

Is Log4j 2.7 vulnerable

log4j:log4j-core is a logging library for Java. Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE). Apache Log4j2 JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints.

Is Log4j 2.16 safe

Log4j 2.16 and earlier does not always protect from infinite recursion in lookup evaluation, which can lead to DoS attacks. This is considered a High (7.5) vulnerability on the CVSS scale.

Is log4j 2.17 vulnerable

3 or 2.17. 0: from these versions onwards, only the JAVA protocol is supported in JNDI connections. Note that only the log4j-core JAR file is impacted by this vulnerability. Applications using only the log4j-api JAR file without the log4j-core JAR file are not impacted by this vulnerability.

Is log4j 2.17 1 safe

1 can probably wait. A number of security professionals say that the latest vulnerability in Apache Log4j, disclosed on Tuesday, does not pose an increased security risk for the majority of organizations. As a result, for many organizations that have already patched to version 2.17.

Is log4j 2.12 4 safe

2 and 2.12. 4) are vulnerable to a remote code execution attack. An attacker with access to modify the Java log4j logging configuration file can build a malicious Apache log4j2 configuration by using a JDBC Appender with a data source referencing a JNDI URI, which can execute remote code.

Is log4j Core 2.17 0 jar vulnerable

3 or 2.17. 0: from these versions onwards, only the JAVA protocol is supported in JNDI connections. Note that only the log4j-core JAR file is impacted by this vulnerability. Applications using only the log4j-api JAR file without the log4j-core JAR file are not impacted by this vulnerability.

Is Log4j 2.17 1 safe

1 can probably wait. A number of security professionals say that the latest vulnerability in Apache Log4j, disclosed on Tuesday, does not pose an increased security risk for the majority of organizations. As a result, for many organizations that have already patched to version 2.17.

Is Log4j Core 2.17 0 vulnerable

Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-beta7 through 2.17.0 (excluding security fix releases 2.3.2 and 2.12.4) are vulnerable to a remote code execution (RCE) attack where an attacker with permission to modify the logging configuration file can construct a malicious configuration using a JDBC Appender with a data source …

Is Log4j Core 2.14 1 vulnerable

log4j:log4j-core is a logging library for Java. Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE). Apache Log4j2 JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints.

Is Log4j Core 2.17 0 jar vulnerable

3 or 2.17. 0: from these versions onwards, only the JAVA protocol is supported in JNDI connections. Note that only the log4j-core JAR file is impacted by this vulnerability. Applications using only the log4j-api JAR file without the log4j-core JAR file are not impacted by this vulnerability.

Is Log4j 2.12 4 safe

2 and 2.12. 4) are vulnerable to a remote code execution attack. An attacker with access to modify the Java log4j logging configuration file can build a malicious Apache log4j2 configuration by using a JDBC Appender with a data source referencing a JNDI URI, which can execute remote code.