Is Log4j 1 Secure
Although this is a secure functionality, the Log4j flaw allows an attacker to input their own JNDI lookups, where they then direct the server to their fake LDAP server.
Is Log4j 1 still supported
Log4j 1. x has reached End of Life in 2015 and is no longer supported.
What is the safe Log4j version
x, the best advice us to use the most recent version. At the time of writing this (2021-03-14), https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/security.html says that log4j 2.3. 2 is safe if you are running the code on a Java 6 JVM. But if you intend to run on a more recent JVM, the latest security patch is advisable.
Is Log4j safe to use now
The widespread vulnerability that first appeared in Apache Log4j in 2021 will continue to be exploited, potentially even in worse ways than we've seen to date. The more worrisome aspect of these threats is that there's a good chance they'll continue to be exploited months or years into the future.
Is 1.18 1 safe from Log4j
Is My Server Safe All servers running 1.18. 1 and above are completely safe.
Is Log4j 2.12 1 vulnerable
log4j:log4j-core is a logging library for Java. Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE). Apache Log4j2 JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints.
Is Log4j 1 affected
Applications using Log4j 1.x are only vulnerable to this attack when they use JNDI in their configuration. A separate CVE (CVE-2021-4104) has been filed for this vulnerability. To mitigate: Audit your logging configuration to ensure it has no JMSAppender configured.
Is Log4j 2.17 1 safe
1 can probably wait. A number of security professionals say that the latest vulnerability in Apache Log4j, disclosed on Tuesday, does not pose an increased security risk for the majority of organizations. As a result, for many organizations that have already patched to version 2.17.
Is 1.18 safe from Log4j
All servers running 1.18. 1 and above are completely safe. For those still running version 1.18 and older, part of the necessary fix is to add specific JVM arguments to your startup command line.
Does Log4j 1.2 17 have vulnerability
Included in Log4j 1.2 is a SocketServer class that is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data which can be exploited to remotely execute arbitrary code when combined with a deserialization gadget when listening to untrusted network traffic for log data.
Is Log4j 2.17 0 vulnerable
3 or 2.17. 0: from these versions onwards, only the JAVA protocol is supported in JNDI connections. Note that only the log4j-core JAR file is impacted by this vulnerability. Applications using only the log4j-api JAR file without the log4j-core JAR file are not impacted by this vulnerability.
Is it safe to play Minecraft 1.8 9 Log4j
Minecraft itself has patched the issue. You are safe to join the server.
Is Log4j 1 affected by vulnerability
JMSSink in Log4j 1. x is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data. This flaw allows a remote attacker to execute code on the server if the deployed application is configured to use JMSSink and to the attacker's JNDI LDAP endpoint.
Does Log4j 1.2 have vulnerability
JMSAppender, in log4j 1.2 version, is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data if the attacker has the 'write' permissions to the log4j configuration.
Is Log4j 1.2 13 vulnerable
Included in Log4j 1.2 is a SocketServer class that is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data which can be exploited to remotely execute arbitrary code when combined with a deserialization gadget when listening to untrusted network traffic for log data.
Is Log4j 1.2 end of life
Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. CSM version 6.3.
Is Log4j 1.2 safe
Included in Log4j 1.2 is a SocketServer class that is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data which can be exploited to remotely execute arbitrary code when combined with a deserialization gadget when listening to untrusted network traffic for log data.
Is log4j 2.12 1 vulnerable
log4j:log4j-core is a logging library for Java. Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE). Apache Log4j2 JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints.
Does log4j 1.2 have the vulnerability
JMSAppender, in log4j 1.2 version, is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data if the attacker has the 'write' permissions to the log4j configuration.
Is Log4j 1.2 affected by vulnerability
JMSAppender, in log4j 1.2 version, is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data if the attacker has the 'write' permissions to the log4j configuration.
Is Log4j 1.2 17 Safe
Included in Log4j 1.2 is a SocketServer class that is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data which can be exploited to remotely execute arbitrary code when combined with a deserialization gadget when listening to untrusted network traffic for log data.
Is log4j 1 affected
Applications using Log4j 1.x are only vulnerable to this attack when they use JNDI in their configuration. A separate CVE (CVE-2021-4104) has been filed for this vulnerability. To mitigate: Audit your logging configuration to ensure it has no JMSAppender configured.
Does log4j 1.2 have vulnerability
JMSAppender, in log4j 1.2 version, is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data if the attacker has the 'write' permissions to the log4j configuration.
