The MITRE ATT&CK Framework is not a technology or software application, but rather a knowledge base and framework that describes these tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs)used by threat actors to carry out attacks.
Security teams use threat modeling, a key method to proactively remediating vulnerabilities and detecting active threats, to understand their adversaries' potential techniques, tactics, and processes (TTPs). The most popular threat modeling framework today is called the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
One key difference between MITRE ATT&CK and NIST is their level of granularity. MITRE ATT&CK is highly detailed and provides a comprehensive taxonomy of adversary tactics and techniques, while NIST takes a more high-level approach, providing guidelines for managing cybersecurity risks across the entire organization.
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques are grouped by tactics and are based on a set of actions that adversaries perform to accomplish their nefarious objectives. Each ATT&CK technique has been observed being used by malware or threat actor groups in attempts to compromise enterprise networks.
For more than 60 years, MITRE has proudly operated federally funded research and development centers, or FFRDCs. We now operate six of the 42 FFRDCs in existence—a high honor.
Let's explain what MITRE is NOT. These are admittedly some of my own ill-informed perceptions. First: MITRE is NOT associated with MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), although it is a spin-off of MIT, or more accurately, of Lincoln Labs which is part of MIT. Another thing I get wrong is the name.
MITRE ATT&CK (Adversarial Tactics, Techniques and Common Knowledge) is a framework, set of data matrices, and assessment tool developed by MITRE Corporation to help organizations understand their security readiness and uncover vulnerabilities in their defenses.
Threat modeling involves identifying and understanding the different potential security risks a specific organization faces. Mitre provides an expansive knowledge center of tactics and techniques that SOC teams can use to model malicious attackers against, including privilege escalation, evasion and lateral movement.
This is the wrong question to ask because the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) and the NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF) are widely different from each other. They are complements to each other, rather than opposing frameworks.
The Enterprise ATT&CK matrix (learn about all three matrices below) has 14 tactics: Reconnaissance. Resource Development.
Tactics represent the "why" of an ATT&CK technique or sub-technique. It is the adversary's tactical goal: the reason for performing an action. For example, an adversary may want to achieve credential access.
MITRE operates federally funded research and development centers (FFRDCs) to assist the United States government with scientific research, development, and systems engineering.
The MITRE Corporation is chartered as a private, not-for-profit company to provide engineering and technical guidance for the United States Air Force.
MITRE was established to advance national security in new ways and serve the public interest as an independent adviser. We continue to deliver on that promise every day, applying our systems-thinking approach to provide solutions that enhance our national security and way of life.
Alternatives to MITRE ATT&CKIriusRisk. IriusRisk.SOC Prime Platform. SOC Prime.SIRP. SIRP.SD Elements. Security Compass.ThreatModeler. ThreatModeler.SCYTHE. SCYTHE.Kenna. Kenna Security.Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool. Microsoft.
The MITRE ATT&CK Matrix for Enterprise  consists of 14 tactics: Reconnaissance, Resource Development, Initial Access, Execution, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, Defense Evasion, Credential Access, Discovery, Lateral Movement, Collection, Command and Control, Exfiltration, and Impact.
Definition. Threat modeling is a structured process with these objectives: identify security requirements, pinpoint security threats and potential vulnerabilities, quantify threat and vulnerability criticality, and prioritize remediation methods.
Step 1: diagram the application. In this step, you gain a comprehensive understanding of the mechanics of your application.Step 2: identify threats with STRIDE.Step 3: mitigate identified vulnerabilities.Step 4: validate.
While both can be applied to private organizations, Ultimately, in the case of RMF vs CSF, the only main difference is that RMF is more stringent and harder to adopt, and will likely only apply if your organization works for the government (see here for more details).
The Risk Management Framework (RMF), presented in NIST SP 800-37, provides a disciplined and structured process that integrates information security and risk management activities into the system development life cycle.
MITRE ATT&CK Matrix
The three primary Matrices in the ATT&CK framework are the Enterprise Matrix, the Mobile Matrix, and the ICS (Industrial Control System) Matrix.
MITRE Engage is a new framework that makes it easier for cyber defenders, vendors, and decision makers to discuss and plan adversary engagement activities.
There are currently 185 techniques and 367 sub-techniques in the Enterprise ATT&CK matrix, and Mitre continuously adds more. Each technique has a four-digit code—for example, Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism is T1548.
MITRE is a not-for-profit corporation committed to the public interest, operating federally funded R&D centers on behalf of U.S. government sponsors. MITRE's mission-driven teams are dedicated to solving problems for a safer world.
Top 10 alternatives to MITRE includes CookieYes, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Workiva, Complinity, ProductDossier PSA, nTask, Airsweb, Risk Radar, VectorVest AND ViClarity. Analyze a range of top Risk Management Software that offer similar benefits at competitive prices.