Is Google Scholar good for medical research
Our findings are consistent with those of previous studies [12,14,15,20,21]. In preliminary testing within targeted areas of respiratory care, sarcoma, pharmacotherapy, and family medicine, Google Scholar provided better comprehensiveness (recall) but worse efficiency (precision) compared with PubMed.
Why use PubMed over Google Scholar
In Google and Google Scholar, we don't know exactly what material is included, compared to PubMed where we know precisely which journals are included. Because of that you need to evaluate the sources even more thoroughly.
What is the disadvantage of Google Scholar
Disadvantages of Using Google Scholar
It's coverage is wide-ranging but not comprehensive. It can be a good research source but should not be the only source you use. It's full- text versions of many items indexed are not available for free through on the web; however, many are accessible through the Library website.
Why is PubMed the best
PubMed delivers a publicly available search interface for MEDLINE as well as other NLM resources, making it the premier source for biomedical literature and one of the most widely accessible resources in the world.
What is the disadvantage of PubMed
Limitations of PubMed
PubMed does not allow a detailed citation analysis (such as those available on the Web of Science). PubMed does not enable one to determine author metrics such as h index (which databases such as Scopus or Web of Science or search engines like Google Scholar provide).
Why is Google Scholar the best in research
Citation and Metrics
Another advantage of Google Scholar is that it provides citation information and metrics for the sources that it indexes. You can see how many times a source has been cited by other sources, and you can follow the links to see who has cited it and how.
Why is Google Scholar more reliable
Google Scholar is interdisciplinary, meaning you are searching a huge range of topics all at once. You get different search results this way than you'd find in subject-specific databases, as a result. You can find A LOT more material using Google Scholar than some other databases (not all).
Why not to use Google Scholar
Disadvantages of Using Google ScholarGoogle Scholar's coverage is is wide-ranging but not comprehensive.Google Scholar does not provide the criteria for what makes its results "scholarly".Google Scholar does not allow users to limit results to either peer reviewed or full text materials or by discipline.
Why is PubMed better than Google Scholar
Google Scholar results are also older on average, while PubMed retrieved items from a larger number of unique journals. Conclusion – In agreement with earlier research, the authors recommended that searchers use both PubMed and Google Scholar to improve on the quality and relevance of results.
What makes Google Scholar different
Google Scholar is a search engine that allows users to search for academic resources and scholarly literature such as abstracts, full-text articles, theses, books, and more from across many disciplines. It also includes access to case law. You can use the above search box to get started.
Why is Google Scholar different
While Google searches the entire Web, Google Scholar limits its searches to only academic journal articles produced by commercial publishers or scholarly societies. Google Scholar eliminates material from corporations, non-scholarly organizations, and from individuals.
Can PubMed be trusted
PubMed is a free and publicly available resource provided by the US National Library of Medicine. It covers the biomedical literature and, as the free version of MEDLINE, is highly authoritative.
Why is Google Scholar better
Advantages of Google Scholar
Google Scholar allows for you to see articles related to the one that might interest you, how many times an article has been cited and by whom, and provides citations for articles in a number of styles. Google Scholar can display links to articles and books held through ECU Libraries.
What is the advantage of PubMed over Google Scholar
PubMed had better precision than Google Scholar for both overall search results (13% vs 0.07%, P < . 001) and full-text results (8% vs 0.05%, P < . 001).
